55 results
- Books
- Online
A letter to Sir William Garrow, His Majesty's attorney-general, on his proposed Bill for regulating the practice of surgery throughout the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland / By James Hamilton.
Hamilton, James, 1767-1839.Date: April 11 1817- Books
- Online
A letter to Sir William Garrow, His Majesty's attorney-general, on his proposed bill for regulating the practice of surgery throughout the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland / by James Hamilton.
Hamilton, James, 1749-1835.Date: 1817- Books
- Online
The appellant's case. Mr. Attorney-General, appellant. Roger Crofts, Job Allibone, Nevil Ridley, Thomas Ange, Roger Woodcock, Mary Maddison, And others, Respondents.
Great Britain. Attorney-General.Date: 1709]- Books
- Online
Job Allibon and Nevill Ridley appellants Her Majesties Attor, Gen. respondent. The respondents case.
Great Britain. Attorney-General.Date: 1708]- Books
- Online
The case upon the judgment for Her Majesty. Inter Domina Regina, et Gawen Mason, Upon a Writ of Error, brought by Mason to reverse a Judgment given in the Queen's-Bench, touching the Office of Warden of the Fleet-Prison.
Great Britain. Attorney-General.Date: 1711]- Books
- Online
The respondents case. Francis Lord Bishop of Rochester, Dean of the Collegiate Church of St. Peter Westminster, Michael Evans Clerk, Lawrence Broderick, Rob. Cannon, and Harry Barker, Doctors in Divinity, four of the Prebendaries of the said Collegiate Church, Appnts. Sir Robert Raymond His Majesty's Attorney-General, Nicholas Onley, Thomas Dent, Thomas Lynford, and Edward Gee Doctors in Divinity, and Samuel Lord Bishop of Carlisle, five of the Prebendaries of the Collegiate Church aforesaid, Robert Freind Doctor in Divinity, Master of Westminster School, and William Farrer, Esq.Respnts.
Great Britain. Attorney-General.Date: 1721]- Books
- Online
Domina Regina, et Mason, in error' An answfr[sic] to the case publish'd by Mr. Mason, the plaintiff, in error.
Great Britain. Attorney-General.Date: 1711]- Books
- Online
Hugh Powell, Esq; plantiff in error, against Our Sovereign Lord the King, defendant. Upon an information in nature of a quo warranto. The case of the defendant in error.
Great Britain. Attorney-General.Date: 1729]- Books
- Online
The Attorney-General, at the relation of Thomas Folkes and Charles Battely, Esqrs. Appellants. John Sutton and Thomas Paman, respondents. The appellants case.
Great Britain. Attorney-General.Date: 1721]- Books
- Online
[Katherina Yale vid. administratrix, Elihu Yale ar. defunct. Quer. in errore.] Et Dominus Rex. The defendant's case to be heard the [blank] day of [blank]
Great Britain. Attorney-General.Date: 1721]- Books
- Online
Rose Duplessis, - - - - - - - appellant. Sir Dudley Ryder, knight, His Majesty's attorney-general, - - - - - - - respondent. The respondent's case.
Great Britain. Attorney-General.Date: 1753]- Books
- Online
The dean and Chapter of the Cathedral Church of the Holy Trinity Dublin, plaintiffs in error. The King, Defendant in Error. Upon a Writ of Error brought by the Dean and Chapter, to reverse a Judgment given by the Court of King's-Bench in England, upon a Writ of Error brought by the said Plaintiffs of a Judgment given by the Court of King's-Bench in Ireland. The Defendant's Case.
Great Britain. Attorney-General.Date: 1724]- Books
- Online
To the King's most Excellent Majesty.
Great Britain. Attorney-General (1736-1754 : Ryder)Date: 1750]- Books
- Online
His Grace Hugh archbishop of Ardmagh, and Nathaniel Whaley, clerk, - plaintiffs. The King by his attorney general - defendant. In a writ of error upon a judgment of reversal given in the Court of King's Bench in England, of a judgment obtained by the plaintiffs in the Court of King's Bench in Ireland, in an action on a quare impedit brought by the King for the Church of Ardmagh in Ireland. The case of the King, who is plaintiff in the action.
Great Britain. Attorney-General.Date: 1729]- Books
- Online
The First part of the attorneys library.
Date: Printed in the year 1722- Books
- Online
Copy of His Majesty's Advocate, Attorney, and Solicitor Generals report. August 16, 1757. To ... William Pitt ...
Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons.Date: 1767]- Books
- Online
The progress and practice of a modern attorney; exhibiting the conduct of thousands towards millions! To which are added, the different stages of a law suit, and attendant costs, with Instructions to Both Creditors and Debtors; Together with Select Cases of Individuals who have Suffered from the Chicane of Pettyfogging Attornies, and the Oppression which Flows from the Present Law Practice: Concluding with Advice to Young Tradesmen. Part I.
Grant, A.Date: [1795?]- Books
- Online
A representation of the injustice and dangerous tendency of tolerating slavery; Or of admitting the least claim of private property in the persons of men, in England. In four parts. Containing, I. Remarks on an opinion given in the year 1729, by the (then) attorney general and sollicitor general, concerning the case of slaves in Great Britain. II. The answer to an objection, which has been made to the foregoing remarks. III. An examination of the advantages and disadvantages of tolerating slavery in England. The latter are illustrated by some remarks on the spirit of the plantations laws, occasionally introduced in notes, which demonstrate the cruel oppression, not only of slaves, but of free Negroes, Mulattoes, and Indians, and even of Christian White servants in the British colonies. IV. Some remarks on the ancient villenage, shewing, that the obsolete laws and customs, which favoured that horrid oppression, cannot justify the admission of the modern West Indian slavery into this Kingdom, not the leaf claim of property, or right of service, deducible therefrom. By Granville Sharp
Sharp, Granville, 1735-1813.Date: MDCCLXIX. [1769]- Books
- Online
Richard Wollaston, Esq; and Sir Biby Lake, bart. appellants. The Attorney-General, and Elizabeth Preston, widow and executrix of Tho. Preston, Esq; respondents. The respondents case.
Great Britain. Attorney-General.Date: 1715]- Books
- Online
Richard Wollaston, Esq; and Sir Biby Lake, bart. appellants. The Attorney-General, and Elizabeth Preston, widow and executrix of Tho. Preston, Esq; respondents. The respondents case.
Great Britain. Attorney-General.Date: 1715]- Books
- Online
Objections or defences for His Majesty's advocate in behalf of the Crown, to the claim of James Earl of Lauderdale.
Scotland. Lord Advocate (Grant : 1746-1754)Date: 1748]- Books
- Online
The most noble John, Duke of Marlborough, appellant. Sir Robert Raymond, Kt. Attorney-General, Edward Strong, sen. and Edward Strong, jun. respondents. The case of the respondents, Edward Strong, sen. and jun.
Strong, Edward.Date: 1721]- Books
- Online
Reports of cases argued and determined in the High Court of Chancery, with some few in other courts. By Charles Ambler, Esq. One of his Majesty's Counsel at Law, and Attorney General to the Queen.
Great Britain. Court of Chancery.Date: 1790- Books
Suffer the children : the story of thalidomide / the Insight team of the Sunday times.
Date: 1979- Books
- Online
Reports of cases argued and determined in the High Court of Chancery, with some few in other courts. By Charles Ambler, Esq. one of his Majesty's counsel at Law, and Attorney General to the Queen.
Great Britain. Court of Chancery.Date: M,DCC,XC. [1790]