An answer to the pretended refutation of Dr. Olyphant's defence.

Date:
M.DC.XC.IX
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: An answer to the pretended refutation of Dr. Olyphant's defence. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    5/16 (page 5)
    mn_ which was no great mark of a very Gunner. Now, had the Ordinary by aft m vercharge alMilk and Sugar, bunt his Cu¬ ller-pipe, and at the fame time taken me Fort, I am certain the Dr. would hav^ teeri far from upbraiding him with his imaii 5Ilii in Gunnery. , ..n I Shall fay nothing to the Rfefutef s m©ft Chriftian way of defaming a Man faiely, bjf making; his Words have a double meaning* as he does alfo the Reprefentation of tlM Matter of Fabt, efpeeially alter his own tart Conieihori in the Refutation, where he Hat- ly acknowledged! he had anfwerea both un~ iujtly arid Irregularly. And if , fays he, m any thing I have ?ranfgrefid, my Adverjary tf to blame, who attacked me loth mjuftly am ih* regularly; and every man muft defend as he u attacked. . „ I am now come to thefe few Anhwei § .given to the Dr’s Authorities in the Reteta- tion, and if all begin with what is faid to j, that ot Fernel, which I find the Reluter looks Gn as the tnoft Material thing he has to lay; He aliedgeth that itt the fcrft Quotation brought by the Dr. from Fernel, that Au¬ thor Ipeaks only of mtermittin g Fevers. Now to cut off all further Debate, 1 fhail grant it ■ be true; but in the m fan time, if the. Rea- ions- tllaRmoVed Fernel to V ofiait in intci - A 3 ...