10 results filtered with: Criticism, Personal - Early works to 1800
- Books
- Online
A review of the works of the Rev. Mr. W. Hawkins, late professor of poetry in the University of Oxford. And of the remarks made on the same in the Critical Review for August, and in the Monthly Review for September, 1759. In a letter to the authors of both Reviews. By an impartial reader.
Veridicus.Date: MDCCLX. [1760]- Books
- Online
The monthly reviewers reviewed by an antigallican: or, a vindication of Dr. Free's late book, upon the importance of the name of England, from the timorous, yet malevolent insinuations of that fraternity.
Free, John, 1712?-Date: [1755]- Books
- Online
An attempt towards a defence of Virgil against the attacks of J. D'Israeli.
Date: [1795?]- Books
- Online
A letter from the prince of the infernal legions, to a spiritual lord on this side the great gulf, in answer to a late invective epistle levelled at his Highness, containing many material and intertaining [sic] esting observations, worthy to be perused not only by his many friends, (witness the late Earthquakes) but likewise by his few enemies in London, Westminister, and ten miles round.
Campbell, John, 1708-1775.Date: M,DCCLI. [1751]- Books
- Online
A refutation of the remarks on the institutes of experimental chemistry: in a letter addressed to the members of the Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures, and Commerce
Dossie, Robert, -1777.Date: 1760- Books
- Online
The conclusion of Bishop Burnet's History of his own time.
Burnet, Gilbert, 1643-1715.Date: M.DCC.XLI. [1741]- Books
- Online
Some observations on a book intitled An essay, &c. In the course of which the Lord Bishop of London's comparison of the more sure word of prophecy, &c. is defended against the objections made to it by the Reverend Messieurs Ashton and Cooke, Fellows of Eton-College; and their several solutions examin'd. In a letter to a country-schoolmaster. Part the first. In which is shewn, I. That the three Particulars to which this Author has objected in Mr. Ashton's Interpretation, are not peculiar to Mr. Ashton's, but common to the Bishop of London's with Mr. Ashton's. II. That the Opinions which he declares for and against are equally both, and each sufficiently, defensible in those three respects, notwithstanding the Force of the Objections which he so dextrously levell'd at one, but which, unfortunately, fell foul on the other. III. That the Impropriety of a Comparison, in any view, between Miracle and Prophecy, in this Instance, is made more apparent by this Author's manner of endeavouring to evade it. Under which Head what has been said by the Reverend Mr. Jackson and Mr. Whitaker, on that point, is consider'd. IV. Some other Objections to Mr. Ashton's Interpretation are remov'd, and some Considerations offer'd to support the Probability of the Truth of that Interpretation. By a late fellow of King's-College, Cambridge.
Ashton, Thomas, 1716-1775.Date: 1752- Books
- Online
A chiding letter to S. P. Y. B. in defence of Epistola objurgatoria.
King, William, 1685-1763.Date: 1744- Books
- Online
Short remarks on some passages in the life of Dr. Kennet, late Bishop of Peterborough. In which he is clear'd, and vindicated from the aspersions laid to his charge. In a letter to a clergyman. By a lover of truth.
Lover of truth.Date: MDCCXXX. [1730]- Books
- Online
Measure for measure; or, a proper reply to a late scurrilous pamphlet, entitled, A proper reply to a letter from the Honourable Thomas Hervey, Esq; to Sir Thomas Hanmer, Bart. In a letter to the fair most noble author. By a friend of Mr. Hervey's.
Friend of Mr. Hervey's.Date: 1742