Concept
Capture at sea - Early works to 1800
Catalogue
- Books
- Online
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Count de Belgiosio. Gerrit Borst, master. Bartholomew Songa, of Warnford-Court, Throgmorton-Street, London, merchant, the claimant of the said ship, her tackle, apparel, and furniture, and all and singular the goods, wares, and merchandizes laden therein, as neutral property, appellant. And Pieter de Cuyper, of the city of Ostend, merchant, Pieter Boeye, of Saint Nicholas, in the county of Waes, in Flanders, merchant, Henry Gistain Vander Sare, Esquire, also of Saint Nicholas, hereditary treasurer and receiver general of the said county of Waes, Johannes Baptistus Ludovicus Vermessen, also of Saint Nicholas, Ferdinand Emanuel de Cauwer, late of Saint Nicholas aforesaid, now deceased, whilst living one of the magistrates of the lordship of Waes, aforesaid, and Johannes Francisus Van Hulle, of Somergen, and registrar of Vanderboute, in Flanders, respectively subjects of His Royal Apostolick Majesty, the emperor of Germany, and respectively part owners of the said ship, and the said Pieter Boeye, as being the sole owner of the cargo laden therein, parties intervening for their several interests in this cause, interveuors. Against John Casey, commander of the private ship of war the Juno, the captor of the said ship and her cargo, respondent. Further case on behalf of the appellant and intervenors.
Great Britain. Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes.Date: 1792?]- Books
- Online
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. The Phoenix, Richard March, master. Samuel Marshall, Esquire, commander of His Majesty's ship of war Flora, and Sir James Wallace, Knight, Commander of His Majesty's ship of war the warrior, their officers and mariners, the captors of the said ship and goods. Appellants, against Thomas Campbell, the claimant of the said ship and her general cargo, on behalf, and as the property of himself, John Ball, Daniel Jennings, William Woddrop, and Charles Haggart; and also of sundry goods, as the property and adventure of Richard March, the master, respondents. Appeal fron the Vice-Admiralty Court of Jamaica. The appellant's case.
Great Britain. Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes.Date: 1785?]- Books
- Online
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. De Herman, Joachim Frederick Parlo, master. Henry Lloyd, Esq. late commander of His Majesty's ship of war the Oiseau, and Hugh Baikie, Esq. late commander of His Majesty's ship of war the Ranger, the captors, appellants, against Sir George Collier, Knt. late commander of His Majesty's ship of war the Canada, joint chaser and captor of the said ship and goods, - - - respondent. Appendix to the respondent's case.
Great Britain. Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes.Date: 1785?]- Books
- Online
Explanatory answer to the observations on the subject of the late capture of neutral ships. The late misunderstanding between the Danish and British governments is now happily removed ...
Date: [1800]- Books
- Online
Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. The Rachael Mobareck, otherwise Tatty Mumbarick, Jose Pereira de Souza, master. The Right Honorable William Murray, commonly called Lord William Murray the claimant, as agent for and on behalf of Ephraim Cohen, of the city of Cochin, in the dominions of the Rajah of Old Cochin, and a subject of the said king or rajah, the real, true, lawful, and sole owner and proprietor of the said ship, her Tackle, apparel and furniture, and of the several goods, wares and merchandizes herein after mentioned, laden and on board the said ship at the time of the capture and seizure thereof, in the month of July, 1781, in the Road of Cudalore, in the East Indies, by a party of scapoys, or seamen, under the command of the RIght Honorable Vice-Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, knight of the Most Honorable order of the Bath, commander in chief of a squadron of His Majesty's Ships and vessels in the East Indies, appellant. Against the said Vice-Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, and James Heseltine, Esquire, His Majesty's procurator-General, respondents. An appeal from the High Court of Admiralty of England. The appellant's case. An appeal from the High Court of Admiralty of England. The appellant's case.
Great Britain. Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes.Date: 1792]