The Public Health and Local government Act, 1875 (38 & 39 Vic. cap. 55), and the statutes incorporated therewith, with short explanatory notes / by J. V. Vesey Fitzgerald.

  • Great Britain.
Date:
1882
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: The Public Health and Local government Act, 1875 (38 & 39 Vic. cap. 55), and the statutes incorporated therewith, with short explanatory notes / by J. V. Vesey Fitzgerald. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    15/588
    Dorling v. Epsom, 269. Dpusfc V. Slater, 310. Draper v. Sperring, 91, 96. Drighlington Local Board v. Bower, 216. Drydenu. Putney Overseers, 160,170. Dudgeon v. Martin, 215. Dudley, re, 21, 356. Dyer v. Best, 254. Dyte V. St. Pancras, 140, 251. East London Waterworks Co. r. Leyton Sower Authority, 267. Eastern Counties Eailvvay, re, 274. Eaton V. Basker, 233, 256. Eddlestono v. Francis, 270, 299. Edgewaro Highway Board v. Colne Valley Water Company, 47. Edgeware Highway Board r. Harrow Gas Company, 159. Edmundson, re, 299. Edwards v. Jolliffo, 70. „ i'. Lowndes, 251. Elias r. Nightingale, 6, 202. Elliott r. Thompson, 309. Ellis r. Bridgenorth, 190. Elwood V. Bullock, 246. Elwes V. Payne, 190. Embrey v. Owen, 41. Evelyn v. Wychord, 4. Everett v. Grapes, 37. Eynsham Eatepayers, re, 364. Fearon V. Mitchell, 192. Fielding v. Ehyl Commissioners, 171, 174. Pilby V. Combe, 36. Fisher v. Prowse, 177, 179, 181. Fleming u. Mayor of Manchester, 24. Fletcher v. Hudson, 301, 387, 384. Flower v. Low Leyton Local Board, 311. Folkestone Corporation, v. Wood- ward, 168, 177. Forbes v. Ecclesiastical Corns., 127. ,, V. Lc-e Conservancy, 154. Foreman v. Canterbury (Mayor of), 154. Foster v. Dodd, 132. ,, V. Oxford, Worcester and Wolverhampton Eailway, 384. Fowler v, Lock, 228. Frond v. Dennett, 232. Frewen r. Hastings, 336. j, V. Lewis, 314. Fulham Board v. Goodwin, 24, 27. Galloway v. London (Mayor of), 5,, 168, 235. Gaskcll r. Bayley, 91, 93. Gay V. Cadby, 35. Geddis r. Bann Eeservoirs, 345. Gerring r. Barfield, 211. Gibson r. Preston (Mayor of), 154, 158. Gill r. Bright, 113. ,, r. Birmingham, 142. Glasgow Ey. Co. r. Hunter, 239. Glover v. East London IV^atorworks. Company, 53. Glossop r. Heston Board, 19, 22. Goodhew r. Williams, 370. Goodson V. Eichardson, 46. Gould V. Bacup Board, 165, 270. Grand Junction Canal Co. v. Shugar, 22, 351. Gray v. Pullen, 25. Great Western Eailway Company v. Bishop, 91, 110. Great Western Eailway Companv May, 236. Grece v. Hunt, 306. Greenwood v. Wadsworth, 183. Hackney Board v. Great Eastern Eailway, 162. Haigh V. Bierly Union, 232. Halifax u. Soothill Board, 69. Hall r. Batley (Mayor of), 27. ,, r. Bootle (Mayor of), 160. „ r. Bristol (Mayor of), 239. ,, V. Nixon, 172, 173. ,, V. Potter, 161. ,, V. Taylor, 251. Halligan v. Gauly, 90. Hammersmith Eailway r. Brand, 240. Hammond v. St. Pancras Vestry, 24, Hands r. Turner, 377. Hargreaves ^■. Taylor, 32, 35, 97. Harper, ex parte, 244. Harper, re and Great Eastern Euil- way, 244. Harrup v. Bayley, 315, 322. Hartley, re, 114. Hartley v. Hudson, 103. Hartnall v. Eydc Commissionei's, 154. Hattersley v. Burr, 172, 173. Hawkins v. Newman, 253. Haywood v. Lo-vvndos, 29. Healey v. Battloy (Mayor of), 166.