Fact versus assertion, or, Critical and explanatory observations on some erroneous statements, contained in Dr. Adam Neale's pamphlet, on the nature and properties of the Cheltenham waters : to which are annexed, Directions for management in the art of puffing, addressed to a friend : with a sequel / by Wm. Henry Halpin.

  • Halpin, William Henry.
Date:
1820
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: Fact versus assertion, or, Critical and explanatory observations on some erroneous statements, contained in Dr. Adam Neale's pamphlet, on the nature and properties of the Cheltenham waters : to which are annexed, Directions for management in the art of puffing, addressed to a friend : with a sequel / by Wm. Henry Halpin. Source: Wellcome Collection.

Provider: This material has been provided by Royal College of Physicians, London. The original may be consulted at Royal College of Physicians, London.

    16/52 (page 8)
    puration of the liver, caused by the Cheltenham Waters! With respect to the case of appoplexy, which Doctor Neale says he well remembers, I contend that if he were even to bring forward the most unquestionable evidence of the fact, as stated by him,—of which I must confess mere assertion does not convince me, it would prove nothing; because, on his own showing, this large-headed and short-necked gentleman prescribed for himself an inordinate quantity of the Waters; and if he did “ tumble down at breakfast,” (to use the Doctor’s elegant phrase- ology,) and expire, is it fair or candid to charge the melancholy effects of his imprudence upon the pro- perties of the Waters? — But to come directly to the truth of this catch-penny publication. The proof- sheets of a Letter purporting to be this now published, w as shown some weeks since to a gentleman interested in preserving the reputation of the Cheltenham Waters, even from suspicion. Why it wras shown, by the Doctor’s friend, to this gentleman, I may be permitted to imagine, nor will the Public be at a loss to devine; but in order to give a clearer insight into this transaction, I beg leave to state a conversation which is more than suspected to have taken place, on the occasion of the proof-sheets being shown to Mr. Pearson Thompson. The friend to whose care they were entrusted, said, he “ supposed Doctor Neale had taken Counsel’s opinion,” and added that “ he, Doctor Neale, was a very determined man, and certainly would publish the book unless some means were taken to prevent it.” To this Mr. Thompson an- swered, “ if it is meant that I, or my Father should purchase the Book, it w ould be an act of injustice to the public, to my Father, and to myself, were I to do so/