[Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council 1928].

  • London County Council (London, England). County of London.
Date:
[1929?]
Catalogue details

Licence: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Credit: [Report of the Medical Officer of Health for London County Council 1928]. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    92/259
    34 contribute £10,000 on the same conditions, with further safeguards as to the com position of the board of management, and the right of residents at Becontree to treatment at the new hosnital Under ground rooms. During the year under review the Council has had under consideration the question of the use of underground rooms as dwellings. The provisions of the law which relate to this subject are contained in section 96 of the Public Health (London) Act, 1891, section 18 of the Housing Act, 1925, and section 122 of the London Build ing Act, 1894. These provisions are mainly directed to securing satisfactory sanitary conditions, including drainage, and stricter standards with the object of preventing the use of such rooms for sleeping quarters can be adopted only as part of the general housing programme of London. Existing legislation for the control of underground rooms has been directed almost exclusively to the regulation of underground rooms used as sleeping places, but it is the use of basement dwellings as living rooms which is particularly injurious to health. This latter use is the more objectionable because generally basement rooms are entirely deprived of sunlight, and, although dark or artificially lighted, are occupied throughout the day mainly by women and children. These rooms, moreover, are not only dark, but damp and ill-ventilated, and no combination of conditions so injurious to health is to be found in any other class of domestic dwell ings. In many of the low-lying areas it is extensively the case that such rooms fail to comply with statutory requirements in such degree as to be unfit for human habitation. They should be dealt with by closing order, but it appears, unfortun ately, that there is no statutory power to close only part of a house. The desirability of promoting further legislation to deal with the whole problem of the use of underground rooms is still under consideration by the Council. Milk and Dairies (Consolidation) Act, 1915. Milk. Samples of the milk forwarded to London from places outside the county are taken and examined under the provisions of the Milk and Dairies (Consolidation) Act, 1915. The railway stations are visited in rotation and, generally speaking, the number of samples taken from the milk sent by each consignor is regulated by the size of the consignment. Endeavour is made to sample all milk entering the county, and during the year, in pursuance of this policy, samples were also taken from supplies of milk sent to London by road, in each case by co-operation with the local sanitary authority. In this way, 19 samples were taken from churns. In addition, 26 samples were taken from milk consigned in glass-lined tanks, 14 of these came from two tanks that came by road, and 12 from two tanks that were borne by rail. During 1928 there were 2,011 samples of milk, taken from consignments sent to London from 40 counties, and submitted for bacteriological examination. In the case of 1,605 samples, the biological examination was completed and of these 143 were found to be tubercle infected, or 8.9 per cent., as against 7.8 per cent. in 1927. In accordance with the provisions of the Milk and Dairies (Consolidation) Act, 1915, information is sent, immediately upon discovery of tubercle infected samples of milk, to the Medical Officer of Health of the county who is responsible for the examination of the cows at the farm whence the sample emanated. From the copies of reports forwarded by the County Medical Officers of Health, it would appear that 66 cows had been found to be affected with tuberculosis and were slaughtered under the Tuberculosis Order, 1925. A large quantity of the milk sent to London is bulked at the country depot prior to despatch. Difficulty has always been experienced in tracing to its source any such milk found to be tubercle infected, and this has now been made the more serious by the despatch of milk in glass-lined tanks. Although in many respects hygienically superior to churns, the mixing of so large a volume of milk multiplies