Appeal cases under the Sale of Food & Drugs Acts, 1875 & 1879, and the Margarine Act, 1887 / by B. Scott Elder.

  • Elder, B. Scott
Date:
1900
Catalogue details

Licence: In copyright

Credit: Appeal cases under the Sale of Food & Drugs Acts, 1875 & 1879, and the Margarine Act, 1887 / by B. Scott Elder. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    104/108
    V. VARIANCE BETWEEN OFFENCE CHARGED AND OFFENCE PROVED, 57. VENDOR SEIZED SAMPLE, question of larceny, 4. VENDOR’S LIABILITY, is the sale to the prejudice of the purchaser, 26—28. no knowledge of adulteration, 31—35. purchase of samples by deputy, 28—30. warranty from wholesale dealer, 36—46. w. WARRANTY, article sold in same state as received, 39, 41. contract and label constitute a warranty, 38. not a warranty, 37. defendant had no knowledge that warranty was false, 46. invoice not a warranty, 36. label on cask with invoice a sufficient warranty, 43. limit of time for proceedings, 45. respondent’s name substituted for original defendant does not necessarily invalidate proceedings, 44. stamp upon skins, “ warranted pure,” no warranty, 40. sufficient warranty in contract regarding specified parcel, 40. written warranty must form part of contract, 43. WRAPPER (margarine), other words besides “margarine ” on wrapper, 75. sale by retail, 76. WRONG LABEL PUT ON LARD, refusal of evidence of mistake, 65. PRINTED BY SHAW AND SONS, FETTER LANE AND CRANE COURT, E.C.