Licence: Public Domain Mark
Credit: Physiology of the carbohydrates : an epicriticism / by F. W. Pavy. Source: Wellcome Collection.
Provider: This material has been provided by the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. The original may be consulted at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh.
26/172 (page 2)
![assumption that the liver is endowed with a glyco- genic function. As my work is incompatible with this assumption, to make the road clear it was disposed of, as the following words from the ‘Edinburgh Medical Journal ’ show :—“ At the beginning of my paper on Hepatic Glycogenesis, published last winter, before the appearance of Dr. Pavy’s work, I said, ‘ That one of the great functions of the liver is to produce sugar will not, at the present time, be denied by any physiologist,’ and added in a foot-note, ‘ The theory of Pavy, repeated in nearly every text-book, that the liver is “ a sugar-destroying, and not a sugar-forming organ,” rests on so unsubstantial a basis, and has been so completely refuted by the work of Seegen and other investigators, that it need not be considered.’ ” As Dr. Paton’s views and mine cannot exist to- gether, either one or the other must fall. My book followed Dr. Paton’s “paper,” and it took the ground from underneath it. As an act, therefore, of self- defence, it became necessary that an effort should be made to overthrow it. But Dr. Paton from his lofty position condescendingly says, “To let these statements [the above-mentioned statements in his « paper ” ] stand after the publication of Dr. Pavy’s book would be marked discourtesy, and I am there- fore glad of an opportunity of bringing forward the evidence upon which they were made.” This evi- dence I will take point by point, and by the time I have finished I think I shall have shown that upon no single point does Dr. Paton succeed in touching, much °less shaking, my position. His evidence](https://iiif.wellcomecollection.org/image/b21961670_0026.jp2/full/800%2C/0/default.jpg)
