The illustrations in medieval herbals are beautiful and mysterious. But if you know how to read them, they also convey a wealth of knowledge about the plants they portray.
The illustrated herbal has an almost unbroken line of descent from the ancient Greeks to the Middle Ages. The tradition owes much to a work by the Greek physician Dioscorides called ‘De Materia Medica’ (50–70 CE), which describes around 1,000 medicines, largely derived from plants, along with some animals and mineral substances.
‘De Materia Medica’ was circulated throughout the European and Islamic worlds. During that time it was translated, embellished and added to in commentaries and copies for local use. In Europe, this tradition developed into the medieval herbal, created in monasteries, usually by Benedictine monks, who ran hospitals and dispensaries with herb gardens.
Following Dioscorides, medieval herbals provided more than just information about the medical use of plants. A typical entry might contain synonyms for the plant and details of its characteristics, distribution and habitat. As well as existing knowledge and lore about the plant, there might be instructions on how it should be gathered and prepared, and recipes for cures.
For nearly a thousand years the same patterns of illustration were copied from one manuscript to another with little alteration. The original illustrations were created primarily for identification in nature. As with all natural illustration, the artists were faced with the challenge of depicting a recognisable image of the plant while also including all its different parts, large and small. The images needed to both record and instruct. Some of the images also served a decorative purpose, capturing the general essence of the plant with or without botanical accuracy. In ‘Medieval Herbals’ (2000), Minta Collins refers to these as “plant portraits”.
The mandrake root
Perhaps no plant illustrates the evolution of the plant portrait in herbals more than the mandrake.
According to the medical doctrine of signatures, there was a clue to the medicinal use of a plant in its similarity to a body part or organ – if there was a likeness, it was meant to treat that part of the body. In medieval herbals the mandrake is consistently depicted as a human form, so powerful that the scream of the living root when wrenched from the ground was believed to be deadly to humans. The recommended method of extraction is often represented as a dog pulling the root from the ground while the plant gatherer stands at a safe distance.
Mandrake was believed to exercise almost magical control over the body. No wonder then that the form of a whole human could be discerned in its roots. It was recognised as an anaesthetic from Roman times. Mandrake was also said to improve fertility and act as an aphrodisiac, so both male and female forms were identified in herbals.
Even if the Benedictine monks did not believe the mythology around the plant, it’s a testament to the copying tradition that this plant portrait persisted for hundreds of years.
As the monastic tradition declined, many of the visual conventions of the medieval herbal were taken up in botanical illustrations for natural history guides and materia medica textbooks for pharmacists and botanists. In particular, depicting different parts of a plant simultaneously proved a useful technique for scientific illustration. In the case of the mandrake, even guides that disavowed in no uncertain terms the mythology around the plant found the plant portrait irresistible when illustrating it, right up to the 18th century.
In the 19th century, the active chemical in mandrake was isolated and identified as one of a class of chemicals called alkaloids. Unlike the medieval monk, the chemist increasingly did not have to rely on the identification and preparation of his medicines from source. He only needed to identify the isolated chemical and know its uses and contraindications. Consequently, entries for mandrake in 19th-century pharmacopoeias are much diminished.
Signs and symbols
One thing that pharmacopoeias and herbals have in common is the use of symbols as a shorthand for generic properties. Look at a modern pharmacopoeia and you’ll still see hazard signs like the skull and crossbones for toxicity. Medieval herbals used images of scorpions, spiders and, in particular, snakes as symbols, but the meanings were often more complicated.
Nux vomica is just one of many plants that appears with a snake symbol in medieval herbals. Although used as a stimulant for centuries, the unprocessed seeds also induce severe vomiting – hence the name. In fact, the active ingredient in Nux vomica is the powerful alkaloid strychnine, which, once isolated in the 19th century, became the poison of choice for many a Victorian murderer.
Somewhat confusingly for the modern reader, a snake might also indicate that a plant offered relief from poisonous bites, or that it might be found near venomous beasts. For instance, in one particular herbal, chamomile is recommended with “a little wine” as protection from snake bite, and appears with a snake in the illustration.
Birthwort (Aristolochia clematitis) was so called for its resemblance to the womb and birth canal, and was believed to help women in labour. In medieval herbals you’ll see the snake symbol beside it, perhaps because it contains a toxic acid. In 1991, dozens of women at a Belgian slimming clinic reportedly suffered kidney failure after using extracts of the plant.
We may have lost some of the richness of the medieval herbal as a source of knowledge, but at least some of its traditions of classifying and decoding plant knowledge live on in modern botanical guides, safety datasheets and modern pharmacopoeias.
About the contributors
Julia is a Collections Researcher at Wellcome Collection with a background in art history. She co-curated the content within the Reading Room and has assisted with content selection for ‘Bedlam’, ‘Electricity: The spark of life’ and ‘Can Graphic Design Save Your Life?’